So, my question is: Would this be our response to Catholicism which elevates tradition on a level with Scripture? Would we say that the theology preserved through these four activities was sufficiently defined so that we need not embrace the writings of the Patristic Fathers as being equal to Scripture. Not long ago someone pointed out to me that all of the early Church Fathers held to Transubstantiation. If that is so, where did they get that idea? The same goes for baptismal regeneration. What happened after the apostles died?

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Scripture references placed between [bible][/bible] tags will be quoted.
  • Scripture references will be linked automatically to an online Bible. E.g. John 3:16, Eph 2:8-9 (ESV).

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.