So some make the case that Secret Mark is really original Mark. Is that really likely, given what we are told about the origins of the gospel up to Eusebius? Looks like a move similar to trying to get the Gospel of Peter or the whole of Thomas to be as early as possible.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.