Concerning the actual stone itself, is it not extremely problematic to the overall theory that a)the New Testament itself doesnt seem to portray anyone expecting a ressurected messiah (besides Jesus himself) and b) there are plenty of conversations concerning messiahship going on in the period before, during, and after the first century and essentially none of them refer to a messiah like figure who dies and is ressurected, excluding, of course, Christian sources?

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Scripture references placed between [bible][/bible] tags will be quoted.
  • Scripture references will be linked automatically to an online Bible. E.g. John 3:16, Eph 2:8-9 (ESV).

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.