Please be sure that your own preconceptions do not keep you from an alternate view of this stone. Already, bias has been shown in immediate claims that the stone proves a common pre-Christian Jewish belief in a Messiah who would die and be raised from the dead, and that Jesus and his followers were simply trying to fulfill the predictions. Why not, rather, allow that this stone might contain an actual G-d-given PROPHECY that is just as authentic as what we read in the Tanakh? Yes, I'm sure that this view offends the slanted bias of many scholars in the crowd, who view any religious convictions as somehow devoid of sanity.

Personally, I believe that G-d will reveal many more such ancient artifacts in days to come, to the extent that true seekers of truth, whose interest has been piqued, will honestly do their research in order to discover truth, rather than to disprove what they do not wish to accept.