What kind of people does our gospel naturally create? Continued

  It depends on what “gospel” we believe and teach. It is a term so common in the English language that it creates different meanings to the hearers. It has been said that the gospel is so simple a child can understand it, yet so deeply profound that the greatest minds have yet to conqueror its depth. So let us get real basic and take a look at what is meant by the gospel. The Greek word  is euaggelion, used 95 times in the NewTestament and means good news. It was used liberally by the authors with the assumption that the readers would know what it meant. Paul was so sure he knew what it meant that he warned people against teaching another version. This is because he claimed that God himself revealed it to him. [1]And that anyone who would pervert it and teach it differently that they will be accursed, i.e go to Hell. Paul’s own statement as to the identity of the gospel is found in his letter to the Corinthians, “ For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. Then he appeared to more than five hundred brethren at one time. Most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep” I Corinthians 15:3-6 RSVPaul also claimed that his gospel was the same as what Jesus taught and the Apostles in Jerusalem. There has been some efforts to identify different gospels, one for the individual, another for the corporate, nations,or communities. Some have said that Jesus taught one version, and Paul another.But this is not the contention of Paul, there in only one gospel, He learned itfrom Jesus, it is in agreement with what the Apostles taught, because they got it from Jesus as well. He mentions this in speaking about himself being the least of the Apostles, but that what he preached and what they preached was thesame. “ Whether then it was I or they, so we preach and so you believed.” [2]There is just one gospel, but the late missionary statesman and scholar Lesslie Newbigin, said it well, “ No gospel is pure, it is always embedded in a culture.” So that gospel has been tailored to various culture sand for different audiences Paul even mentioned that there was the gospel of the circumcised and that of the uncircumcised. He was entrusted with taking the message to the Gentiles while Peter primarily was preaching to the Jews. This analysis might have been a snapshot rather than trend, because we know Peter ministered broadly later in his life. [i]It is fair to say that we also focus on a certain part of the gospel message and its many applications depending on who was on the receiving end. When Paul tailored his message to the philosophers in Athens, it reflected his attempt to find some common ground on which to start them thinking with him. This differed from his hearings before the Roman judges, Felix, Festus, and Agrippa or the people in Jerusalem.[ii] In those cases Paul gave his personal story and makes no philosophic statements, nor employed any poetry. So it could be proposed that there is only one gospel, but many ways to talk about it depending on your hearer. Pastor Tim Keller says he preaches both the circumcised and the uncircumcised gospel in New York City,and allows each group to overhear him preach to the other groups. [iii]But what is that gospel? The answer is crucial because it determines what kind of people we become. What we are becoming governs what we are doing, that includes the reputation we have, the mission we undertake, and whether the community of faith is a self-indulgent crowd or a sacrificial force for good. There is a tendency to separate the idea of salvation as simply getting into heaven from behavior and reputation. “Christians are not perfect, just forgiven” says the bumper sticker, the sentiment seems to be more of an excuse that an explanation of grace. The importance of getting the gospel right and then applying it correctly cannot be overstated. This is at the root of the American problem that has caused the church to fade in its impact. The drive to be relevant has diminished the distinction between the church and the culture. And when that difference gets too narrow, the church disappears into what Saint John called the “world.”  [1][1]Galatians 1:6-9 , Galatians 1:11 “For I did not receive from man, nor was Itaught it, but it came through a revelation of Jesus Christ.” [2] ICorinthians 15:11 RSV [i] Galatians1:8, 2:7 [ii] ActsChapters 22-28, there are four presentations by Paul [iii] Keller,Tim The Gospel in all its forms, Leadership Journal , Spring 2008 Page 78

Hi Bill!

Do you not mean "unnaturally create"?

Ever wondered why the 'perfect and correct way of salvation' is not specificaly given in the Bible? why did Paul not give us the 'Four spiritual laws'?
Why did we not get given a 'sinners prayer'?
Why is there no record of how the first converts were led into salvation?

Perhaps to prevent us from setting out such a sure fire procedure?

We have created a 'gospel' message that is not good news to those who need some good news! It has come with more rules and regulations than the Old Covenant and it is no wonder that so many are put off by it.

As an unchurched person who looks at the tele evangelists, Mega 'church' money squandering machinery, book stores, bumper stickers, placard weilding "God hates fags" 'Chrstians', how can an unchurched person relate this perverse mesage these people are sending out, to any sort of good news?

This is why I so enjoy what is known as the Emerging church. People who are saying 'lets get away from all the junk we have been fed over the years and let's get back to the original message of good news' - good news for the individual which will then become good news for the family, then the community.

It is why I enjoy the writings of folk like E.W. Bullinger and Bill Gillham - true Christianity with Jesus living His life through us!
Not popcorn and candy floss Purpose Drivel 40 days, Lets guess the date, Faith not presumption, How to make Godly wealth etc etc ad nauseum!

Yet even the emerging is falling into the trap of trying to appease the modern pharisees when asked to define their 'doctrine' - or perhaps 1 Cor. 1 : 26 - 31 is an misprint?

So, yes, what we become here on earth is vital and is a clear indicator of what message we have received - are we becoming more like Jesus or more like a Pharisee?

To Anonymous,

Just the opposite! After stumbling onto (and from) a different blog written by a leader of the emerging church movement I was refreshed to find this blog by Bill Hull. The junk that you reference is not a product of Evangelical Christianity, which itself, by definition, is trying to "get back to the original message of good news". The junk comes naturally to us. As Bill is suggesting it takes a lifetime of faith and submission to get rid of all the junk.

Nick