This blog is now up at http://www.christilling.de/blog/2007/03/guest-post-by-richard-bauckham.html This covers some issues about the names. Matthew cannot be outside the family. Only three names overlap. This is a big family, too big for Jesus' remaining family, the name of mariamenoumara cannot be linked to Mary Magdalene. He walks one through all the details of this, a step at a time. So take a look.
Featured Series
Gay Marriage: Analysis Of Newsweek's Article
Post 1: The Beginning
Post 2: Journalistic Integrity
Post 3: Bible And Marriage
Post 4: Homosexuality and the Bible
Post 5: Remaining Issues
Featured Post
Featured Site
Check it out, PrimeTimeJesus is now live.
Add Widget
Click here to add Bock's Blog widget to your site (Blogger, Facebook, iGoogle etc.)
Popular content
All time:
- Hollywood Hype: The Oscars and Jesus' Family Tomb, What Do They Share? (expanded version)
- Summary on Emergent/Emerging Church Movement - Oct 6 (revised and updated - Jan 12)
- No Need to Yell, Only a Challenge for Some who Need to Step Up and Could (expanded) - Feb 24/25
- Gnostic Myth No. 3 Missing Gnostic Gospels are Christian Gospels- June 12
- You Never Know- Discussion on Homosexuality (Updated and Revised- July 11, Sept 3, Sept 10) July 10.08
- Progressive Dispensationalism - June 29
- About EXPELLED, in Theaters Friday April 18 04.16.08
- What is Gnosticism Anyway? June 9
- Emergent/Emerging Introduction - Sept 8
- On a worldwide hiatus - Oct 13
Random image
Recent blog posts
- Positive Movement on the Evangelical Bible Translation Front Oct 13
- Professor Claims God is Not Creator according to Genesis Oct 12
- ABC Nightline on 10 Commandments Sept 25
- Deeper Connections Sept 22
- On the Gospel Sept 15, 09
- Transform World New York: Statistics to Ponder
- Seminary Education and the Globe Aug 21
- Trip to Australia (and Other Nations) Wraps Up with Video/Audio Posting Aug 3 09
- Christopher Forbes on Josephus about Jesus July 27 09
- Superb Ministry Model in Taiwan July 15 09
About Bock
Dr. Darrell Bock is Research Professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary. He also is Professor for Spiritual Development and Culture there. He is an Editor at Large for Christianity Today and is a Past President of the Evangelical Theological Society (2000-2001). He is the author of over twenty books and is a New York Times Best Selling author. He has been blogging on this site since May, 2006.
Search
Navigation
Syndication
Latest image
User login
Sites I Frequent
- Ben Witherington
- Beliefnet
- Bible.org
- Bible Places
- Christianity Today
- Evangelical Textual Criticism
- Israel Antiquities Authority
- NT Gateway Weblog
- Online Critical Pseudepigrapha
- Religion Headlines.org
- Religion News Service
- Scot McKnight
- Theologica (Justin Taylor)
- The Christian Post
- Theologyprof.com (Mark Devine)
- Andreas Köstenberger
Dr.Bock,
First issue: It seems from Dr.Tabor's blog, he has an answer for the "missing" 10th ossuary, but we'll have to wait to after the show! Since you'll be there after the show, I thought I might give you a possible head's up. Dr.Tabor's way out may be as follows: It seems obvious from Dr.Zias comments (Dr.Witerington's blog) that the 10th ossuary was plain, and uninscribed (thus not the "James" ossuary). One way Dr.Tabor and others might get around this difficulty has to do with something Dr.Bauckham has observed. In Dr.Bauckham's blog excerpt, he thought the Talipot tomb was rather large and could hold up to 35 ossuaries. Up to now, it seems Dr.Tabor has argued that the 10th ossuary in Klon and Rahmani's report is the "James" ossuary. In Dr.Klon's original report (I believe) he records the fact that the Talipot tomb had been disturbed/lotted in antiquity (something Dr.Crossan wanted to investigate). Could Dr.Tabor argue that the other ossuarries (11 to possibly 35) were stolen at that time, and thus also the "James" ossuary was stolen? He could possibly confirm this theory by "patented" patina "finger printing" which supposes matches the "James" ossuary with the Talipot tomb.
Second Issue: My Hebrew is a little weak (it's been a few months), and my Aramaic is even weaker, but both Rahmani's report and Klon's report state that the first name inscribed on the "Jesus" ossuary is unclear. Dr.Klon records that the inscription "Jude Bar Yeshua" confims the reading "Yeshua." But doesn't this assume an "immediate" family tomb? If Dr.Bauckham is correct that the tomb was large and good for possibly 4 to 5 generations and maybe does not include immediate family. Could not the first name of the supposed "Jesus" ossuary be the son of the other Joseph in the tomb, ie. "Yose" who is argued to not be "Joseph" the supposed father of Jesus? Thus, "Jude Bar Yeshua" may be the son of another "Yeshua," possibly an unknown brother of Joseph. I hope this is not to complicated.
Thanks for your hard work,
David Beatty M.Div.,Th.M.-NT (TEDS)
Post new comment