Jonathan:

Appreciate the desire to defend Erhman here, but why does Ehrman have to inform when several sources exist that discuss what he raises? Anyone heard of the Jesus Seminar and their publicity campaign from a decade ago? Ok, he may organize it a little differently for everyone (and somewhat selectively in what he does and does not mention about the issues). He also does repeat known old arguments.  As for pastors not teaching their flocks this kind of material, I am aware of many pastors who do. Is it not a little condescending to suggest that pastors do not teach this, even though they know otherwise and should? Maybe some pastors are not as convinced as he implies they ought to be? This type of presentation (the old lady example and my response) is known as anecdotal evidence. It can be used to justify a lot of diverse activity. How many specials (From Jesus to Christ, [2003, PBS] is but one example) lay this kind of claim for diversity in the NT out for television audiences in a very clear manner using many well known names? Peter Jennings did one on Jesus for ABC as well, several years ago. No, Ehrman has taken up the role of being the voice for such views. That is just an observation. That is taking up the crusade.