Dr. Bock:
May I ask another question, which is indirectly tied to your small/large gospel table illustration? If this does not fit into this discussion thread, than can we take this up separately or can you recommend some literature on this?

I am trying to understand how Paul and the other NT writers shift from acceptance by faith in Jesus’ atonement now (Rom. 3:20-25) to acceptance at the final judgment based on works (Rom 2:13, 14:10-12; 2 Cor. 5:10; Eph. 6:8; Col. 3:22-4:1).

My background taught me to make a clear distinction between justification and sanctification (I am ok with this) and to carefully never mix the two in discussions of salvation (not so sure). I don’t see the same sensitivity in the NT. I was taught to see sanctification as a separate work of God, really separate, to the point that it is irrelevant to the final judgment for salvation. It was tied to “rewards” (1 Cor. 3:10-15). The word “inheritance” (1 Cor. 6:9) was treated as equivalent to rewards. If I didn’t care about rewards I could skate into heaven without obeying. But some of Paul’s language is not so cleanly separated.

I understand that my justification today is a pulling forward of God’s acceptance of me on judgment day. I understand that God is doing many things in salvation, which includes forgiveness because of Christ (Rom. 8:33) and life change to be like Christ (Rom. 8:29). Are the apostles using the two perspectives – faith and works produced as a result of faith – interchangeably? I don’t see them explaining clearly how they can make this shift so easily when it causes us such heart burn.

Thanks for considering this,
Paul

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.