Dr. Bock,

Thanks for clarifying this further. Yes, this helps. If I'm understanding correctly, you do not interpret the NT to view the cross as a mere transaction. Instead, this "mere transaction" view is the way that some wrongly tend to present the cross.

I'll admit that I still feel hesitant about your image of the meal (and analogy with the Jewish cult) because it sounds like you are accepting this premise that the cross (or death for sin) is a "mere transaction," then building upon it. But I think I see your overall point more clearly now, that we must not divorce the cross from its benefits, or we will misunderstand the gospel.

Thanks again for the interaction,

Kevin