The point about baptism in Jesus' or the Trinity's name is really a point about the authority under which something is carried out. That makes the current usage ironic. For if one baptizes in Jesus' name it is an affirmation of Jesus' authority to forgive sins. If one baptizes in the name of the Father, Son, and the Spirit, the point is extended to the Spirit. In either case, Jesus is elevated. My own preference is the Trinitarian formula because the Father is responsible for the forgiveness, Jesus is the means of it, and the Spirit is the gift that is given as a result (see Romans 6-8 imagery). I am not sure there was only one apostolic formula in the beginning, since both expressions point out the centrality of Jesus and the role of the Father would be a given, as woudl the idea that the Spirit is central (See remarks about the Spirit and Messiah by John the Baptist (Luke 3:15-17).

DLB

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.