My question is related to Sora's.

One argument is that Acts and Luke where not written by the same person. But rather, in the 2nd century, someone got ahold of some sort of proto-Luke, and then that perons revised both Luke and Acts to look like two parts of one work. Is this too conspiracy-minded for you?

Regards,
Mark

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.