Dr. Bock,

Many on the net claim that most scholars regard Acts as fiction. Mostly because of little discrepancies b/w it and the letters of Paul. One assertion I recntly read is very adamant, "scholars have been forced to conclude 90% of Acts is fictional." In your estimation, since I can't get the commentary, does this statement accuratly reflect the way NT and Classical scholars veiw Acts?

Another claim frequently encountered, is the long standing claim that Luke and Acts were written by the same author is false. Thus allowing for a later date for Acts since it isn't mentioned as early as is Luke. What indicators do we have that show Acts is from Luke?
God Bless
Sora

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.