Gay Marriage: Analysis Of Newsweek's Article
Post 1: The Beginning
Post 2: Journalistic Integrity
Post 3: Bible And Marriage
Post 4: Homosexuality and the Bible
Post 5: Remaining Issues
Dr. Darrell Bock is Research Professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary. He also is Professor for Spiritual Development and Culture there. He is an Editor at Large for Christianity Today and is a Past President of the Evangelical Theological Society (2000-2001). He is the author of over twenty books and is a New York Times Best Selling author. He has been blogging on this site since May, 2006.
Thank's Dr Bock for your clarification and opinion.
What I believe to be Robinson's strongest point is the silence in the NT of the destruction of Jerusalem and the devastation connected to it.
However, it is rather easy to postulate that Mark and Matthew is writing before for ad 70; but how about Luke?
I do not find Robinsons argument to solid concerning the lukan account especially when Luke (possible) edited/altered the Markan contribution with
"When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near". This seems evidently to be vaticinium ex eventu - or doesn't it?
Dr Bock, what's your stand on Luke? Pre-70 composition or post-70?
Sincerely
Magnus Nordlund