Well, according to Tabor there aren't two ossuaries to compare, just one. And if he's wrong, there still aren't two ossuaries to compare, since one of them has disappeared.

All you have is one ossuary, one set of measurements from the original Talpiot find, and two sets of measurements (apparently) of the ossuary that you do have (the James ossuary). And one of the two sets on the James ossuary is said by Tabor to match the measurements on the missing ossuary. Which of course raises the question what these different methods of measurement are, and why you should think that one method is the correct one for comparing to the James ossuary's measurements, rather than the other method.

But what does that matter, given that more than one of the people who found and catalogued the Talpiot ossuaries has said that the now missing ossuary had no inscription, whereas the James ossuary clearly does have an inscription?

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.