Rahmani's report gave the length of the 10th Talpiot ossuary as 60 cm. In Biblical Archaeology Review, the measurement of the length is 50 cm, BUT that is the length at the base. The ossuary is flared, and has a trapezoidal shape. As a result, the longest upper edge is 56 cm long. (This is all stated plainly in the Nov./Dec. 2002 issue of BAR.) That's still a difference of more than an inch, though.

Tabor insisted that he's got re-measurements that confirm that the dimensions are the same. Maybe he thinks that a misreading of an archaeologist's handwriting occurred, so that what was intended to mean "50 cm" as the length of the 10th ossuary was interpreted, and typed up as, "60 cm" by the time Rahmani made his catalogue. (That's not what Tabor seemed to claim in the show, though.) Anyway, it would be nice if the tenth ossuary -- which, contra Tabor, is mentioned in Rahmani's catalogue, and is described as "plain" and "broken" -- was located and photographed.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.