David:

My take on this is that the argument for the other half of the story shoudl be the focus of such a production. It might involve several kinds of participants and perspectives, but the goal woudl be to show that what is often sold as the truth is not all there is to consider, that a stong case can be made for another view of things. What often happens is that the same basic texts are appealed to, but they are assembled in a completely different way. The point would be to see which synthesis makes the most sense (recognizing at the same time that judgments are also impacted by worldview perspectives). What is needed is for people to realize there is a very credible take on this material that they may not have heard before.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.