I've been reading a number of blogs about this Discovery Channel documentary. I love the Discovery Channel and the National Geographic Channel. They have great documentaries that are both entertaining and informative. But I wonder, are their other historical documentaries as flawed as their Bible documentaries? Should I treat a documentary on the rainforest with the same skepticism as I do their Bible documentaries? It seems to me if they are untrustworthy in their production of this historical information, perhaps they are just as flawed with their other information. Now I know something about the Bible, so I can see right through their flawed Bible documentaries. But I know nothing about the South American tree frog. So if they had some on-the-fringe tree frog "expert" fill my head with hogwash I wouldn't know the difference. If I were a non-Christian watching the Discovery Channel and came upon this documentary, whose to say I wouldn't believe it. I think this is irresponsible journalism on the part of the Discovery Channel and they should be held accountable in some way.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.