I've been reading a number of blogs about this Discovery Channel documentary. I love the Discovery Channel and the National Geographic Channel. They have great documentaries that are both entertaining and informative. But I wonder, are their other historical documentaries as flawed as their Bible documentaries? Should I treat a documentary on the rainforest with the same skepticism as I do their Bible documentaries? It seems to me if they are untrustworthy in their production of this historical information, perhaps they are just as flawed with their other information. Now I know something about the Bible, so I can see right through their flawed Bible documentaries. But I know nothing about the South American tree frog. So if they had some on-the-fringe tree frog "expert" fill my head with hogwash I wouldn't know the difference. If I were a non-Christian watching the Discovery Channel and came upon this documentary, whose to say I wouldn't believe it. I think this is irresponsible journalism on the part of the Discovery Channel and they should be held accountable in some way.